Some of the takes on here are so delusional. Here’s the things that are true:
AAC fans think B12 schools should join the AAC and many have HORRIBLE takes like “the AAC is better than the B12 without OU and UT”. They think at the least, Cincy, Memphis, UCF, Houston etc should join the B12 and want it to happen BADLY.
B12 fans DO NOT want AAC schools to join the B12. They would be BUMMED if it happens. Many ISU fans (and KU)don’t understand why the B1G wouldn’t want them.
B1G fans DO NOT want B12 schools like ISU and KU. We’re not ND, UNC, UVA, etc. We share a limited market, we’re not historically elite with built in advantages, the state of Iowa isn’t a growing population and economic base like Colorado (Boulder is near the fast growing Denver market), it’s just not exciting to them and we don’t add much other than being respectable for 4 seasons straight in football. Just as we don’t want Cincy and Memphis who are big market teams, they don’t want us.
Rutgers and Maryland was a game changing move at the time that hasn’t aged well. Nebraska was a powerhouse 10 years removed from being a dynasty. Missouri was a top team with a whole state locked down.
Iowa will not block ISU from getting in the B1G. It would save them an OOC game and the BOR wouldn’t allow that. Don’t forget Barta helped us out big time in getting the Fiesta Bowl over IU.
But at the end of the day, it makes a lot more sense for the B1G to do nothing versus add some teams that are just ok. An underlying story is when will conferences start to kick out members or when will other mass exoduses occur such as PSU, UM, OSU.